Tracking the passage of time!

When playing D&D and similar systems, often the passing of time is left out of the equation for simplicity sake. When players buff themselves it’s often considered that the buffs will last most of the dungeon, if not the whole thing.

One method I have switched to during areas where the passing of time is important is switching to initiative for asking what people are doing. The party rolls initiative, then until the next combat encounter we go down the list to ask what people are doing. On Roll20 I use a custom Round Counter that raises by 1 every time it comes up on the turn order. In person I use a handheld counter device that I bought for Hackmaster.

Structuring the gameplay in this manner may seem very board gamey, but it gives you an accurate passage of time as often one round is six seconds, so 10 rounds is one in-game minute. It also gives people a chance to roleplay, or get involved if they feel they may be stepping on the toes of their allies, or are shy to butt in. This system allows for ease in triggering and resolving traps as players move on their turn and thus, can accidentally get in front of a rogue who’s on the lookout for such devices.

I use a house rule that every x number of rounds an encounter roll is made. The rate of encounters varies based on the location. In a tomb in the middle of an old mountain pass the rate will be high, 15-20 rounds for a random encounter due to isolation. Places like a castle or a big bads hideout the rate may me 5-10 as more individuals are in the location to intercept the party.

It can slow the game down a bit, and some players can get confused on how to handle when actions happen. It’s best to make clear “when” actions happen, and if people are waiting for others to act first in the round. Delaying actions and readying is all easy to do, as long as no immediate threats are present. When it comes to moving on a per square basis (if you use a map) I usually just let everyone move at the system’s Run speed and still take an action for game flow sake.

A big takeaway from switching to this system is realistically it takes the average party of mine 3-5 minutes to clear a dungeon from start to finish. That can take all game session, but it really breaks down the scope of how time actually passes. It feels like in-game it should take literal hours but the 6 second round helps to make it feel fast and deadly. Another situation I find that my games have gone in when I switched to keeping people constrained to the initiative is people tend to separate from the party. The ability to feel as if they have to act on their own causes groups to form, and the party indeed becomes split, often times over large areas.

Three combats happening at once while the party is spread out over the dungeon.

Of course if you and your players enjoy a more organic turn and burn with no pauses that’s great! I always like to try to use the rules the best I can, and I found this is a good way to keep effects tracked and encounter rate balanced.

4th Edition, did it really butcher player choices?

When 4th Edition came out I was excited after seeing the preview materials at Gencon, playing a few demos in the second floor ballroom, and keeping tabs on it during it's late days of development. Before this edition even hit the shelves, I had to go to two different stores in order to secure a set of book at launch (the first store refused to order the books for me, a paying customer, because "I disagree with 4th Edition").

Throughout the life of the edition, I would find that my local group would slowly sour on the AEDU power system, eventually refusing to play in any games I ran with the system. My personal feelings were the opposite, I loved being able to keep combat to a level where I could focus on the small things to keep my players on their toes, instead of worrying if certain monsters could instantly tee off on unsuspecting players.

The biggest gripe my players had was they felt that AEDU power system took away agency... which made me scratch my head because these were the same players that rarely did anything more than say "I swing" and roll a D20. Suddenly I had players trying to 'break' the system by asking how they can jump off a table, do a cartwheel, and land and attack two enemies. If they failed at whatever check I gave them, they'd blame "these damn limiting powers" and grumble the rest of the session. "I don't like how I have WoW abilities" a player playing a fighter would say as they spend two turns masterfully navigating the battlefield and setting up a knock back that caused the entire party to be in range of a critical foe.

Spells worked on the AEDU power system in 4e, which I can understand made some people apprehensive since it tossed out some utility spells and made a lot of the standby spells Rituals (which were still usable, just required more time and some gold cost). Healing was redone to use Healing Surges, a system where each character can only recover hit points so many times between rests. The game focused on allowing 'healer' based characters to heal allies while attacking foes, and gave temporary hit points a greater focus to help mitigate damage between fights. When you were healed, often you spent a healing surge which meant you healed either a fixed dice type, or a number of dice equal to your class's Hit Dice. This meant heals scaled with level better based on a class's expected hit point pool.

Milestones happened if the party managed to clear multiple fights without taking a rest. A milestone gave players Action Points, essentially allowing them to spend them to gain an extra turn in combat, among other things. This gave incentive to avoid the ten minute workday, and for a party to push forward.

When I type all of this out I get a sick feeling in my stomach because I -love- all of this but know a majority of my friends hated it. From a DMs perspective 4th Edition took the combat of D&D and gave it a much needed work over. Roleplaying has always been a side effect of D&D, and when addressed in past editions has been very slim and relying on player/DM imagination.

I do think though all of the gripes are because 4th Edition did what past editions had tried to do but failed. It offered a combat system that put the tactical aspects past editions had talked about on the pedestal. Powers for each class gave you options to move around the battlefield, move others, shift, and manipulate space around your character from melee or afar to punish enemies and help allies. In other systems often combat boiled down to get near something and swing until it falls, or hope an ally has a spell to neutralize it. The option to knock things back, do a cartwheel off of a table and land on the other side of your target, or grapple someone and fall backwards was always there. When 4th Edition gave everyone the Dummies Guide to Doing More in combat through powers, people lost their minds because now it was the -system- saying they can do more. "Oh I have to spam this ability over and over" was a common complaint, which while there was a such a move for each class it was just "Basic Attack, but better based on your role". The simple act of adding a name to "I swing" and giving it a keyword turned people inside out.

So in retrospect, I don't think 4th Edition took away from player agency or from combat. It paired down the skill list, made combat more tactical, and allowed for staying power of the PCs to scale with level. The system had a section dedicated to doing 'off the wall' actions such as using improvised weapons, skill checks to do extra things, etc. If anything I think 4th Edition better prepared a DM and the party for thinking outside of the box, even if the Powers built a sort of odd 'wall' to see it. Granted 4th Edition had it's issues with horrible modules, bloated HP for some monsters in the first Monster Manual, and skill challenges.

I am sure there are other issues with 4th Edition no listed above, and I am sure there are other mechanics I have glossed over that people enjoyed or hated. Many of the smaller systems from 4th Edition were carried over into 5th Edition (Short Rest healing with Hit Dice, Recharge abilities on monsters being two immediately notable ones).

No system was or is perfect, but I do think 4th Edition received a bad shake. Here's to you 4th Edition, hopefully one day you'll get a revisit by WotC.

Energy in the GM - Makes or Breaks the Game

There are many, many nights when I get behind my GM podium, sigh, look at the table, and have a moment where I can feel the energy just run out of me at my feet. My players are ready to go, but I am lacking the energy to pull the trigger and announce the start.

It can be tough having a long day, then having to GM. Energy in the GM is the most important aspect that comes to the table. If the GM has energy, passion, and conviction for what they are going to run, it makes the session flow better. Smaller mistakes are easily overlooked by the players, and humor can flow seamlessly with the serious aspect of the game.

For me, staying on my feet while I GM is the key to staying focused and my energy up. I try my hardest to avoid being bland, to avoid sitting still for more than 20 minutes. While talking in character I walk around on my edge of the table, or walk around the table. I use voices, I am willing to use my hands and physical actions to talk for the NPCs. The GM's podium is nothing more than a vessel to carry my notes and to act as a surface to roll my dice. Some players will be intimidated by this approach, but I have found that there are a lot of players that are hesitant to RP who are knocked over the edge to start being in character for more than their actions.

Gathering a binder full of quick and easy notes to reference is one of the biggest aides to a GM. Name lists, encounter tables, monster stat blocks, etc. All of this can help keep your flow up and allow you to feel like king of the world. I went to Staples and grabbed a 2 dollar 2" binder during a back to school sale, and then snapped over to Amazon to grab a box of 100 paper sleeves for it. While it is a work in progress, just having some of the more basic GMing items already in it is perfect and saved my bacon in several games (especially the name list, I am terrible with names on the fly).

Keep snacks on hand for you, and only you, to reach. GMs while running can quickly be deprived of the group's snacks as players munch away, listening and acting accordingly while you are busy doing the prep work. Often I will buy myself a bag of chips and a 2 liter of cola to drink while I run my games. This is a minor thing, but it's a big step to keeping motivated to continue that narrative train.

Ultimately you need to figure out what keeps you going, and what keeps you in the game. I find standing, having my own snacks, and a binder full of quick nabbing notes is the key to staying in the game. What's yours??

It's never 'no', it's 'how'

Players all the time will look for ways to do things that are outlandish, and are completely out of left field. They will look at you from the front of the GM's screen, and will smile as they glance at their sheet and their fellow players.

"Can I use my Acrobatics to grab the propeller's rod, then run around and around to generate lift?"

The natural reaction is to roll your eyes until they generate an electrical arc, then say with a deadpan retort 'No'. People will get upset, the player will try to say that the +27 they have should allow them to do this feat. But ultimately, you knew the answer was no, and they were able to save the wrist strength on rolling the dice.

These sort of things take control away from the players, even if we know going into the situation that it is going to be a futile attempt. One of the biggest things about TTRPGs is the amount of 'freedom' players have. They are known for being a great escape from the boring, 9 to 5 monotony of the real world. This escape for many is the chance to do things that they would be unable to do. Some want to get swole, grab a sword, and take on 5 to 6 Orcs at once while weathering a sea of blows. Others want to wield arcane magics or serve a deity that blesses them with ultimate power. By itself, the very idea of these capabilities achieve a high level of choice to the characters.

When a player asks you a question you are sure you know the answer to already, avoid saying 'no', but 'how'.

How are you going to pull this one way door open?

How is your Fireball going to cook a row of chickens perfectly with zero error?

How will your character use their excellent Acrobatics skill to turn the propeller on the airship?

This does two things: It gives the illusion of choice, and it also keeps the level of narrative control in the player's hands consistent. Nobody likes being told no, and when it comes to something that is supposed to be an escape, it hurts even more. Players should be allowed to experiment and experience the pain of failure for their characters. In some moments, such an action as the propeller example above in a way make sense. It's a desperate attempt in a life or death situation. It adds tension, and the GM only had to ask how.

While the player is rolling their dice to determine how well they were unable to accomplish their task, you should use this time to plan an explanation that will make their attempt powerful. Players love to hear how well they do, for better or for worse. The key to delivering bad news is doing it with flare. It makes you feel more alive, and it lets your players know that you care.

Roll20 Marketplace Review - Greytale's Dungeon Items

I have spent more money on the Roll20 Marketplace than I frequently care to admit. Some nights, I lay in bed and think about the dollars that have went into various tile sets while my wife shows me paint ideas for our house.

This money has went to both good and bad items, however there is one provider on Roll20 that has given me the most bang for my buck: Greytale's Dungeon Blanks. I have purchased almost every set from the Roll20 page for Greytale's, and I find that everything that they have released is spot on 100% perfect. Every set has instructions on how to use the pieces in regards to sizing and how certain pieces will interact with others.

The biggest draw to me has been however the amount of customization that is possible with each set. The Blanks in particular have a great deal of mileage on them, and my players that play in my online games can attest to seeing Dungeon Blank Set #2 for almost every dungeon. Each piece if clear of any what I call 'identifying mark's. You will find no furniture baked into the tiles, no blood spots or even statues. Each piece is just the base terrain, which for me is a huge draw to the set. I like to do my best on making sure every dungeon is different, and having tiles that allow me to have a literal blank slate to work with is great. They offer a cavern set, which is amazing and speaks for itself.

Art wise every set is top notch, the furniture packs they offer are done in the same art style as the tiles which allows them to blend as if the entire set was done as one large piece. This seems like common sense to many people, after all it is probably done by the same artist. But a lot of sets in the Roll20 Marketplace under the same author have various styles, or colors that are off hue from one another. It is a real struggle to find good sets for dungeon layouts, and even harder to find them at acceptable prices. For me, Greytale covers both of these.

If Greytale's people ever read this, I do have one bit of feedback for you: release sets faster please! I still need to pickup the newest set as of this writing, Greytale Dungeon Blank # 4, but I can tell looking at it that I will enjoy using it. My players will enjoy the sight of ramps, and enjoy the change of scenery from the other 3 sets.

If you want to check out these sets for yourself, follow this link here to head to the Roll20 Marketplace and take a look at the sets!

Handling a Rules Lawyer at the Table

At some point in the life of a GM, there has been that one player whose knowledge of a system is infallible. They studied it, played it since they were but a mere child, and are ready to remind you of every little discrepancy in the rules even if it hurts their fellow party members. They can end games and ruin friendships, but most of all they can make the game a no fun quagmire for the GM.

Handling this sort of player is a true test of social skill, requiring a bit of a backbone as a GM. Before you even consider approaching them on this, look at a few factors:

-          Are the players verbally or visibly upset when the Rules Lawyer starts to grumble?

-          Is the Rules Lawyer only speaking up when it is in their favor?

-          Most importantly, is the Rules Lawyer hurting your enjoyment of the game?

If they tick any of these options above, then you need to take action immediately. If you let it linger, it will hurt the game in the long run and people will drop out. Worst of all, if it bothers you the most, it can hurt the quality of the game resulting in a massive degradation of player enjoyment that can be difficult to come back from.

Turning the negative energy the person at the table is generating into a positive one can be difficult. Often times many will understand if you tell them to bring any rules questions up after the game with you, in order to keep the table moving and play time unbroken. However, there are a few who will take this as a way of silencing them, being unwavering in their dedication to the written word of RAW (Rules as Written). The best way to handle this is turn that negative energy into something positive for the whole table. Let them know that you could use their expertise and knowledge in areas such as Skill Resolution, which is often times a section that many players are unfamiliar with. Have them help the group out by providing basic handouts on commonly misunderstood rules that can slow a table down if they get out of hand. Using the person as a tool instead of a hindrance is a great way to turn their energy into something that benefits all, and can help take a burden off of your shoulders!

It is sad to say however that there are many who will try to abuse their standing knowledge of the game for their own goals, or to harm other players at the table. Trying to speak with them can prove futile as they continue their old ways, or worse, start to become distraught at the table. These players should be cut from the roster and a replacement found, if possible. It is the hardest thing to do as a GM, but think of the game and your enjoyment. Think of the time and energy everyone else, including yourself, have put into the table. Will it sour some grapes? Yes, but in the long run it is worth a bit of heartbreak for a long term relief of knowing you can enjoy your own games.

Remember at the end of the day: The GM’s word is law, and for good reason. Never be afraid to back up your feelings or decisions.

In Defense of Group Character Creation

Oftentimes GMs will have their players create the character they need for the game at home before they arrive to the table for the first session of play. Arrays and point buys have eroded the need for ‘GM confirmed’ rolls for attributes and there are so many systems out there that allow for easy character generation for most major systems. Making the character before the game saves a session of time, but what is the cost of this convenience?

I have always felt that by having characters generated before the game starts, we lose out on a chance for our players to appreciate the setting. Watching over their shoulder while they consider their choices allows you to both make sure you are providing an adequate challenge, but you can also help strengthen their bond with the setting. Offer suggestions from the handout (if there is one) about how certain classes can tie in with existing organizations. Talk about the terrain and certain events while they create which can give them ideas as to what would be strong in the campaign. Talking about a setting will churn thoughts among your peers more than simply placing it on a piece of paper. Speak with a tone that shows you care about what you created and you can easily encourage your friends to think about their in-character choices.

With everyone in the same room, you also allow for the group to synergize better with one another. You have an easier time filling class roles, and people can work together to create a bond that works in-character for the campaign. Probably one of my biggest gripes is when players come to the table with multiple characters rolled ready to go when I ask them to roll at home. It gives of a feeling of caring only for the game portion of the campaign, not the setting itself. It’s a nice gesture in order to make sure roles are established to avoid shortcomings, but it feels hollow unless they have a good back story for each.

Newer players will always benefit the most from group creation, with veterans helping them determine the direction they should go for the idea the new player has in mind. Many systems that offer a lot of complex choices also suffer from the Ivory Tower gaming theory where certain options seem appealing, but are useless. These options are traps for new players who only know the basics, and can deteriorate playing experience in later sessions. The group experience can also make sure that the player’s character is in line and 100% correct for game time to help keep the game time flowing smoothly.

The best reason though to create characters as a group is the bonding aspect of it all. Knowing what design process went into each character, interacting with each other by providing suggestions and support for character ideas and themes, all of this can result in a greater experience at the table come game time.